Who knew????
From PC World (New Zealand):
Who knew????
Symantec found that the average number of security threats on religious sites was around 115, while adult sites only carried around 25 threats per site -- a particularly notable discrepancy considering that there are vastly more pornographic sites than religious ones. Also, only 2.4% of adult sites were found to be infected with malware, compared to 20% of blogs.
Why religious sites you might ask? “We hypothesize that this is because pornographic website owners already make money from the Internet and, as a result, have a vested interest in keeping their sites malware-free -- it’s not good for repeat business,” said the report.
Who knew????
It's probably because they tried to make the website for "free."
:-)
Posted by Jon Davis Jr. | 6:22 PM